At one time, Amazon Web Services (AWS) was the go-to provider for businesses looking to cash in on the benefits of cloud computing. Today, AWS is still seen as a leading cloud innovator and one of the top providers of cloud computing services. However, there’s been a recent trend which shows a staggering amount of businesses are leaving AWS in favor of AWS alternatives such as a hosted private cloud provider. Below, we’ll take a look at some of the top reasons why businesses are now leaving AWS.
For all its hype, AWS actually offers businesses very little control over the setup of their server. In many ways, AWS is something of a cookie-cutter solution that offers only a set number of options for customization. These options may be more than enough for businesses that are just starting out with cloud computing, but as many businesses have expanded their use of the cloud they have found that AWS is simply unable to offer them the amount of control that they need. To solve this problem, these businesses are largely turning to dedicated server hosts which provide full root access, allowing businesses to set up their server to their exact specifications rather than trying to mold their business around the preset options that AWS offers.
If you want to use AWS, you’re going to have to deal with a steep and expensive learning curve. The amount of proprietary knowledge required to use AWS has led Amazon to create six different certifications that developers must earn before they are able to use the service, and testing for these certifications isn’t free. In fact, it’s estimated that businesses must spend an average of $475 per developer in order to ensure that their developers have the knowledge necessary to work with AWS.
The cost of training developers to use AWS isn’t the only cost-related drawback of the service. While AWS may seem more affordable upfront, the reality is that, over the long-term, AWS will often end up costing businesses up to twice as much as using a comparable dedicated server. One of the main selling points of the public cloud and AWS is that it is supposed to be the most affordable option. Once businesses begin realizing that this is not the case, though, they find themselves having few reasons to continue using AWS.
Given the sharp rise in data breaches over the past few years, cybersecurity has become one of the foremost concerns for businesses storing their data on the cloud. This, however, is a concern that AWS is not able to adequately address. While AWS does provide security options, the responsibility of correctly configuring those options falls to the end-user of AWS rather than Amazon. This means that businesses using AWS must have experienced cybersecurity professionals on their staff who are capable of ensuring that data stored on AWS is properly secured. Talented cybersecurity professionals are hard to come by, though, especially for small to medium sized businesses. Hosted private cloud providers, on the other hand, often offer managed security options, meaning that they handle all aspects of your server’s security and leave you to focus on other areas of your business without having to worry about your data being stolen or otherwise compromised.
Depending on where you are located, storing data through AWS will likely require you to move that data off shore to a foreign datacenter. In many cases, this creates a number of security concerns as well as various technicalities since laws regarding cybersecurity differ from country to country. More and more, companies are preferring data sovereignty – keeping their data stored at a datacenter located in their home country. This may or may not be possible withAWS, but it is certainly possible when you choose to work with local providers for your data storage needs.
The lack of flexibility offered by AWS stems from the lack of control that it provides. When you aren’t able to tailor a public cloud environment in any way you see fit to meet your specific requirements, it’s very difficult to remain flexible as your business scales or otherwise changes. What worked well on day one might not work so well on day one-hundred, and with AWS you have few options available to adapt your environment to meet the new requirements of your business. Compare this to a hosted private cloud solution which offers a wide range of customization options in regards to hardware, software, and system resources. Hosted private cloud providers also offer other options that make the service even more flexible such as the ability to migrate many legacy applications from an on-premise infrastructure to the cloud and access to greater automation capabilities. When it comes to the amount of flexibility offered, AWS simply can’t compete with AWS alternatives such as a hosted private cloud solution.
AWS has played a vitally important role in helping make cloud computing available to businesses of all sizes. Now that the industry has grown, though, AWS is facing some stiff competition from AWS alternatives that are able to offer a better service that has less of a learning curve for a more affordable price. The five shortcomings of AWS that we’ve outlined are certainly things that you should consider before you choose AWS for your business’s web-hosting needs. With a little effort, chances are you will be able to find a provider that will better suit your business.